Blue Finance & Investment

Ocean-Climate Philanthropy at 0.05% of Global Giving Leaves Asia's Offshore Wind and Shipping Transition Chronically Underfunded

Ocean-Climate Philanthropy at 0.05% of Global Giving Leaves Asia's Offshore Wind and Shipping Transition Chronically Underfunded

At the Philanthropy Asia Summit's Sea Change panel on ocean-climate solutions, speakers highlighted a stark funding mismatch: less than 0.05 percent of global philanthropic giving sits at the intersection of ocean and climate, despite the ocean's role in absorbing around 30 percent of human carbon dioxide emissions and more than 90 percent of excess heat, and despite the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy estimating that ocean-based climate solutions could provide up to half of the emissions reductions needed by mid-century on a 2 degree Celsius pathway.   The Scale of the Funding Gap   Global philanthropic giving to climate mitigation amounts to less than 1.5 percent of total charitable giving, with ocean issues receiving approximately 0.25 percent and the intersection of ocean and climate receiving roughly 0.05 percent. The narrowness of this funding base is significant because ocean-climate work covers offshore wind development, shipping decarbonisation, blue carbon sequestration, marine carbon dioxide removal, and coastal resilience, areas that collectively span power generation, global trade, food systems, and the future of island and coastal economies. Ocean philanthropy has historically focused on conservation, fisheries management, and coastal livelihoods, while climate philanthropy has concentrated on power grids, land transport, buildings, forests, and industry. The result, as Al Harris of the Ocean Resilience and Climate Alliance noted at the panel, is that ocean philanthropy and climate philanthropy have developed as separate cultures, leaving the interface between them chronically under-resourced.   Why Asia Is the Central Opportunity   Asia holds approximately 60 percent of the world's population, a large share of global exclusive economic zones, much of the world's coral and mangrove biodiversity, more than half of wild fish landings, and most aquaculture production. The region also accounts for a large share of global offshore wind capacity, a major portion of shipping emissions, and most of the world's port, shipbuilding, and maritime manufacturing capacity. Despite this concentration of both ocean-climate risk and ocean-climate opportunity, only around seven percent of global ocean philanthropy flows to Asia, equivalent to approximately 60 to 65 million US dollars annually according to CEA Consulting, and much of that is distributed unevenly across a small number of countries and concentrated in conservation rather than mitigation sectors.   The Catalytic Role of Philanthropy in Offshore Wind   Philanthropy cannot build offshore wind farms, but it can fund the enabling conditions without which large-scale development stalls or proceeds irresponsibly. Jamie Choi of Tara Climate Foundation framed offshore wind as a systems question rather than a technology question, requiring clear leasing rules, environmental standards, grid planning, port upgrades, supply chains, vessels, finance, and credible permitting processes that bring fishers, regulators, local governments, and conservation groups into a shared decision-making process. In many Asian markets, these systems-level prerequisites are incomplete, and philanthropic funding can support marine spatial planning, environmental impact assessment standards adapted to tropical waters, research on migratory birds and benthic habitats, and independent technical analysis that helps governments make better decisions before commercial pressure dominates the process.   Tropical Offshore Wind and Community Engagement   The Philippines has been identified as a test case for tropical offshore wind development. Rizaller Amolo of Ocean Energy Pathway described a country with substantial wind potential, a growing project pipeline, rich marine biodiversity, important migratory bird routes, and millions of coastal fishers whose livelihoods depend on nearshore waters. Responsible development in such contexts requires mapping fishing grounds, sea lanes, cultural sites, and biodiversity values before decisions harden, and designing mechanisms through which project revenues, jobs, and training can benefit host communities. Amolo also raised the possibility that turbine areas could, in some cases, function as other effective area-based conservation measures, with foundations supporting artificial reef structures and safety zones limiting bottom trawling, provided siting, regulation, monitoring, and local consent are designed carefully.   Read more: IMO Adopts MASS Code to Govern Large Autonomous Ships With Two-Year Voluntary Introduction Period From July 2026   Shipping Decarbonisation and the Limits of Delayed Regulation   The recent deferral of the IMO's Net-Zero Framework was highlighted by Freda Fung of ClimateWorks Foundation as a reason to focus more intensively on work that can proceed in the absence of a global mandate. Shipowners, fuel producers, ports, and financiers need a credible regulatory signal to invest in zero-emission vessels and infrastructure, and when that signal slips, the incentive to wait or make conventional choices strengthens. Practical progress is nevertheless occurring at the level of green shipping corridors, port readiness, and fuel supply chain development across Asian shipbuilding and port hubs. Philanthropic funding can support the coordination infrastructure that makes green corridors viable, including platforms that align fuel producers, shipowners, ports, regulators, cargo owners, and financiers around shared investment decisions. Qiu Peng of Tsao Pao Chee underscored that for shipowners the commercial constraint is not whether decarbonisation is desirable but whether new fuels, infrastructure, financing, and regulation align in time to make investment viable.   The Enabling Environment as the Priority   Speakers consistently returned to a common insight: offshore wind and green shipping do not stall primarily because technology is unavailable. Delays arise more often from unclear rules, slow permitting processes, limited technical capacity, weak inter-agency coordination, or inadequate community engagement. These are precisely the areas where philanthropic grants have comparative advantage over commercial capital and public budgets, which are poorly suited to funding early-stage analysis, independent policy advice, regulatory design, convening, local technical capacity, and civil-society participation. The interventions that materially influence major transitions are often administrative, analytical, or social rather than highly visible, and philanthropic funders are well positioned to support them when they focus on identifying which decisions are genuinely constrained by a lack of information, coordination, or capacity.   The Case for Local Capacity in Asia   A recurring theme at the panel was the need to increase philanthropic support for local organisations relative to large international bodies. Much ocean philanthropy in Asia has historically flowed through international organisations, but the next phase of ocean-climate action will depend heavily on local universities, policy institutes, civil-society organisations, community associations, and technical experts who understand national institutions and local political contexts. Amolo argued that durable transitions require local capacity, not imported expertise, and several other panelists reinforced the point that local organisations need greater direct support to engage credibly with the technical and regulatory questions that will shape the ocean-climate transition in their countries.   Bridging Siloed Perspectives   Harris argued that one of philanthropy's most important roles in the ocean-climate space is creating spaces where conservation groups, energy planners, maritime stakeholders, finance actors, and community representatives can engage before their differences harden into entrenched opposition. Ocean-climate issues sit at the intersection of conservation, energy, transport, finance, industry, and community development, and the tendency for each sector to engage only within its own perspective has historically slowed the development of coherent transition strategies. Small grants that fund multi-stakeholder platforms, trusted intermediaries, and cross-sector convening can have outsized influence on the quality and speed of decision-making in markets where these perspectives have not previously been brought into structured dialogue.   Outlook for Ocean-Climate Funding   The analysis presented at the Philanthropy Asia Summit points to a conclusion that is both optimistic about impact potential and sobering about current resource allocation. Philanthropic capital will never provide the bulk of the funding required for offshore wind or shipping decarbonisation, but its influence is greatest when it helps governments, communities, researchers, and industry address problems that larger sources of capital are poorly suited to solve. The key question for funders is not whether to support ocean-climate work in Asia but how to identify the specific interventions, at the level of policy design, community engagement, technical research, and local capacity, that genuinely influence the pace, inclusiveness, and credibility of the transitions already underway in one of the world's most important ocean-climate regions.

Policy & Governance

How Marine Spatial Planning Works

How Marine Spatial Planning Works

The ocean is getting crowded. Fishing fleets, shipping lanes, oil and gas platforms, offshore wind farms, undersea cables, aquaculture pens, tourism operators, and marine protected areas are all competing for the same stretches of water, and left to sort themselves out they collide. A wind farm is proposed on top of a prime fishing ground. A shipping lane cuts straight through a whale migration corridor. A new cable route crosses a fragile reef. On land, societies solved this problem more than a century ago by inventing zoning, the practice of deciding in advance which parts of a city are for housing, which for industry, and which for parks. Marine Spatial Planning, or MSP, is the ocean's version of that idea: a structured, science-based, and public process for deciding what happens where at sea, so that economic activity and environmental protection can coexist rather than cancel each other out. It is spreading quickly around the world, and here is how it works, step by step.   1. Ocean Uses Are Mapped   Everything starts with taking stock. Before a government can plan its waters, it has to see them clearly, so the first step is to map how different parts of the ocean are actually being used right now, for fishing, shipping, energy production, tourism, conservation, and recreation. The result is a composite picture of overlapping human activities laid across the sea, revealing where things concentrate and where they collide. The value of this step is easy to underestimate. For most of history, the various uses of the ocean were governed in isolation, with one agency overseeing fisheries, another shipping, another energy, and none of them looking at the whole. No single map existed showing all the demands being placed on the same body of water at once. By assembling exactly that view, MSP makes the ocean legible for the first time, and that shared picture is the foundation on which every later decision rests.   2. Data Is Collected   Knowing where activities happen is only half the picture; planners also need to understand the environment those activities sit within and the value they generate. So the next step gathers scientific, environmental, economic, and social data: where the sensitive habitats, spawning grounds, and migratory routes lie, how currents and species move through the region, how much each industry is worth, and who depends on the sea and in what ways. Because MSP is meant to be ecosystem-based, understanding the ecology matters just as much as understanding the economy, and the two are woven together throughout. This is also where one of the field's real constraints bites. A marine spatial plan is only ever as good as the data and maps beneath it, and in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries, the scientific baseline is thin. Gaps in knowledge translate directly into weaker plans, which is why international efforts to support MSP put so much emphasis on building data and mapping capacity.   3. Stakeholders Are Consulted   The most widely used definition of MSP, developed by UNESCO's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, describes it explicitly as a public process, and this step is where that word earns its meaning. Fishers, coastal communities, shipping and energy industries, scientists, Indigenous groups, environmental organisations, and government agencies are all brought into the process to help shape the plan rather than merely receive it. Genuine, early engagement is what separates a durable plan from a contested one, and it is also where MSP is hardest and most heavily criticised. Done well, consultation surfaces the local and traditional knowledge that no dataset captures, and it builds the buy-in that makes a plan stick. Done as a box-ticking exercise, it breeds resentment and resistance. Critics warn that MSP processes can be dominated by the loudest and best-resourced economic interests, sidelining small-scale fishers and conservation concerns in favour of large industries, a danger sometimes described as blue grabbing. The credibility of the entire exercise rests on whether this step is real or merely for show.   4. Conflicts Are Identified   With the maps drawn and the data and stakeholder input in hand, planners can pinpoint exactly where uses come into tension. These are the areas where different ocean activities compete: a proposed wind farm sitting over productive fishing grounds, a busy shipping route crossing a sensitive habitat or a migratory pathway, an aquaculture site clashing with a tourism beach. Each of these conflicts is assessed and prioritised, and just as importantly, planners identify compatibilities, the cases where two uses can safely share the same space. The goal at this stage is not to pretend that every conflict can be eliminated. It is to make the trade-offs explicit and deliberate. Without MSP, competition for ocean space tends to be resolved by default, going to whoever arrived first, shouted loudest, or carried the most political weight. By surfacing conflicts openly and ranking them, MSP replaces that scramble with a considered set of choices that can be debated and justified.   5. Ocean Zones Are Designated   This is the heart of the process and the reason MSP is so often called zoning for the ocean. Drawing on all the preceding analysis, specific marine areas are allocated to particular uses: marine protected areas in one place, an offshore wind development zone in another, designated fishing grounds, shipping lanes, aquaculture sites, and cable corridors elsewhere. Some zones are reserved exclusively for a single use, while many are managed to allow several compatible activities to share the same water. The pioneering example is Australia's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, which was comprehensively rezoned into a network of areas under different rules, including large no-take zones closed to fishing, and is widely studied as an early demonstration that ocean zoning can work at scale. Belgium, whose small and intensely used slice of the North Sea leaves almost no room for conflict, became one of the first countries to adopt a comprehensive, legally binding marine plan. In both cases the logic mirrors city zoning: the aim is to sort uses by compatibility, keeping incompatible activities apart while letting complementary ones overlap, not simply to lock everything away.   6. The Plan Is Implemented   A map has no force until it is backed by law. In this step the plan is translated into concrete policies, regulations, and permits that govern who may do what and where, enforced through licensing and monitoring. This is what turns a planning document into a real system of ocean management that guides sustainable use and reduces conflict between users. Implementation can actively unlock new activity rather than merely constrain it. In the United States, Rhode Island's Ocean Special Area Management Plan zoned the state's waters and, in doing so, cleared the path for the Block Island Wind Farm, the country's first offshore wind project, by identifying a suitable site and resolving competing claims in advance. That case points to what has become one of the single biggest drivers of MSP worldwide: the rapid global expansion of offshore wind. Governments racing to build vast new energy installations need a credible way to fit them into seas that are already full, and MSP is increasingly the tool they reach for.   7. Progress Is Monitored   Marine Spatial Planning is not a one-off map to be drawn and filed away; it is a cycle. Authorities regularly evaluate environmental conditions, economic outcomes, and compliance, then revise the plan as circumstances and knowledge change. The European Union, for instance, obliges its member states to review their maritime spatial plans at least once every ten years, building revision into the system by design. This adaptive quality has become more important than ever, because the ocean being zoned is itself in motion. Climate change is shifting the very features that plans are built around: fish stocks migrate poleward as waters warm, storms grow more intense, and sea levels rise, meaning a plan that fits the ocean perfectly today may misfit it a decade from now. A static plan risks locking in yesterday's assumptions, so the monitoring and updating step is what keeps MSP honest and relevant as the underlying reality moves beneath it.   8. A Balanced Ocean Economy   The purpose of the entire exercise is balance: protecting marine ecosystems while supporting sustainable economic activity and building long-term resilience into the ocean. When it works, MSP reduces conflict among users, gives industries and investors the certainty of knowing where they are allowed to operate, safeguards the habitats that underpin fisheries and coastal protection, and steers the growth of the wider blue economy along sustainable lines. For this reason MSP has become a central instrument for delivering global commitments, from the ocean goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda to the target of protecting thirty percent of the sea by 2030, and it is championed by UNESCO's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission together with the European Union, which have set out to triple the area of ocean under such plans by the end of the decade. Yet balance is genuinely difficult to strike, and it would be dishonest to present MSP as a guaranteed win. Critics point out that these processes can tilt toward blue growth at the expense of conservation, that plans are sometimes stronger on paper than in enforcement, and that coordinating across national borders, where the ocean pays no heed to lines on a map, remains a stubborn challenge. MSP is a powerful framework, but its promise depends entirely on honest data, real inclusion of everyone who depends on the sea, and the political will to enforce the lines once they are drawn.   Did You Know?   Marine Spatial Planning is often described as zoning for the ocean, helping countries manage competing marine activities in much the same way cities use land-use planning to separate housing, industry, parks, and roads. The approach has spread with striking speed. Two decades ago only a handful of countries had government-approved marine plans covering a fraction of a percent of the world's waters, whereas today roughly seventy nations have MSP initiatives underway and around a tenth of the world's exclusive economic zones are covered by approved plans, with international bodies pushing to triple that reach by 2030. As the sea fills up with wind farms, cables, shipping, and aquaculture, the once-simple act of drawing sensible lines on the water is fast becoming one of the defining tasks of modern ocean governance.   Note: This article reflects the state of marine spatial planning as of mid-2026, drawing on sources including UNESCO's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, the European Commission, and MSP practice worldwide. Figures for the number of countries with MSP and the share of exclusive economic zones covered are widely cited estimates that continue to change as more plans are adopted.

Shipping & Ports

Cape Maritime Orders VLCC in Japan as Tanker Newbuilding Expands

Cape Maritime Orders VLCC in Japan as Tanker Newbuilding Expands

Greek owner Cape Maritime Corporation has firmed up an order for a very large crude carrier at Japan Marine United, expanding its presence in a segment experiencing record contracting activity. The 301,000-deadweight-tonne vessel is scheduled for delivery in 2028 and brings the company's VLCC orderbook to three vessels. The order forms part of an ambitious tanker expansion strategy that has left the Adrianopoulos family-led group with 11 tankers in its fleet and five vessels still under construction.   Details of the Order   Cape Maritime has contracted a Japanese shipyard for its latest tanker. The Greek owner has commissioned Japan Marine United Corporation to build the vessel. The ship will have a capacity of 301,000 deadweight tonnes. It is scheduled for delivery in 2028 under the terms of the contract. Market sources indicated the order was finalised a couple of months ago. The order strengthens the company's position in the crude carrier segment. Cape Maritime manages the group's tanker activities within the wider organisation. With this latest contract, it now has three very large crude carriers under construction. The other two vessels are being built by CSSC Qingdao Beihai in China. Those ships are scheduled for delivery by 2029.   Context of Record VLCC Ordering   The order arrives amid exceptional activity in the segment. Contracting for very large crude carriers during 2026 has reached an all-time record high. This surge has been driven partly by strong owner confidence in market fundamentals. Greek owners have been among the primary forces behind the wave of orders. They have secured nearly every available early delivery slot in the market. Most of that activity has been concentrated at Chinese yards. Greek owners have focused on Chinese shipbuilders for early delivery positions. Japanese shipbuilders, however, continue to attract strong interest from the same owners. This interest is particularly evident in the tanker and bulk carrier segments. Cape Maritime's choice of a Japanese yard reflects this continued appeal.   Read more: SMD Delivers Heavy-Duty Cable Plough to Prysmian for Offshore Grid Links   Cape Maritime's Tanker Strategy   The company has pursued aggressive growth in recent years. Cape Maritime has focused its expansion largely on newbuilding acquisitions. This strategy has built a substantial fleet in a relatively short period. The company currently lists 11 tankers across its active fleet. A further five vessels remain under construction at various yards. Deliveries from this programme are now gathering pace. Earlier this week, the company took delivery of the Suezmax tanker Cape Armathia. The 158,000-deadweight-tonne vessel came from CSSC's Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding. It was the second vessel of this size built at the yard for the company. The remaining orderbook consists of three VLCCs and two LR1 tankers at Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, with deliveries through 2027.   Activity Across the Wider Group   The group's expansion extends beyond tankers into other segments. Cape Shipping oversees the group's dry bulk and container vessel operations. This arm has also remained active in the newbuilding market. It has two Capesize bulk carriers on order at Hengli Heavy Industries. A further two 3,200-TEU container ships are under construction at New Dayang. The existing fleet spans several vessel types and vintages. Cape Shipping's active fleet comprises six bulk carriers built between 2007 and 2012. It also operates seven container vessels constructed between 2015 and 2021. This diversified base gives the group exposure across multiple shipping markets. The parallel newbuilding programmes suggest continued growth across each segment.

Fisheries & Aquaculture

Kenya's Mida Creek Fishers Face Shrinking Catches and Coastal Pressure as Ocean Warming Reshapes Indian Ocean Fisheries

Kenya's Mida Creek Fishers Face Shrinking Catches and Coastal Pressure as Ocean Warming Reshapes Indian Ocean Fisheries

Along the shores of Mida Creek in Watamu on Kenya's Indian Ocean coast, fishers and fishmongers are confronting a combination of declining stocks, warming waters, destructive fishing practices, and growing competition for coastal space from tourism development, with catches that once sustained generations of families now reduced to two or three kilograms per boat on many days. Community groups are responding with mangrove restoration campaigns, beach cleanups, and proposals for temporary no-fishing zones, but fishers say government support and genuine public participation in development decisions will be needed if the creek's fisheries are to survive the next decade.   Declining Catches and a Generation of Change   Philip Baya, chairperson of the Dongokundu local fisher group and a Mida Creek fisherman for more than 30 years, describes a transformation in the fishing grounds that is visible in every trip on the water. Fish that could once be caught close to shore, within sight of women waiting on the beach, now require boats to travel much farther into the creek or out toward the open sea. Catches have fallen sharply, with many returning fishers bringing undersized or juvenile fish that raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of the local fishery. Alice Kazungu, a fishmonger and vice chair of the newly formed Mida Beach Management Unit, has described waiting from early morning until midday for boats to return, sometimes watching fishers come back empty-handed. For Kazungu, who depends almost entirely on selling fish to feed her children, the wait has become a daily symbol of a deeper uncertainty that is reshaping livelihoods across the creek.   Ocean Warming and Environmental Drivers   Scientists have documented warming sea surface temperatures across parts of the Western Indian Ocean, one of the fastest-warming tropical ocean regions globally, and community members in Mida Creek describe observing warmer waters and stronger tidal currents than in previous decades. Some species that were once common in local catches have become scarce or disappeared. The broader scientific context is clear: the global ocean has absorbed more than 90 percent of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases, with rising temperatures driving coral bleaching, disrupting breeding cycles, and reshaping fish habitats across tropical coastal systems. An El Niño event building in the tropical Pacific is expected to affect several coastlines including the Western Indian Ocean, adding a further near-term stressor to a system already under chronic thermal pressure. Baya has also attributed part of the decline to destructive fishing practices including monofilament nets, illegal gear, and bait-digging that has damaged seagrass beds, mangroves, and nursery habitats where fish once thrived in abundance.   Read more: Marine Battery Systems Target Lower Cost and Faster Installation as Vessel Electrification Accelerates   Coastal Development and Community Access   The pressures on Mida Creek's fishing communities extend beyond the water. As Watamu has grown into one of Kenya's most popular coastal destinations, tourism businesses, resorts, restaurants, and recreational boating operations have expanded along the shoreline, competing for the same coastal space that traditional fishers have relied on for generations. Many community members welcome the jobs and income that tourism provides, but fishers are increasingly concerned about proposals that could affect the landing sites used to launch, repair, and store fishing vessels. Boat operator and fisher Said Bayathoya has stated that development should not happen without community involvement, describing fishing as the only livelihood available to families who have lived along the creek for generations. Baya has called explicitly for public participation before any decisions affecting landing sites or coastal access are made, arguing that communities have a right to be included in the governance of the spaces on which their survival depends.   Community-Led Conservation and Restoration Efforts   Despite the scale of the challenges, Mida Creek's fishing communities have organised substantial self-directed responses. Community groups have launched mangrove restoration campaigns, with BMU members including Kazungu planting new trees that provide breeding grounds for fish, reduce coastal erosion, and stabilise the shoreline. The Mida Creek Conservation Community, an umbrella body coordinating dozens of local conservation groups, oversees mangrove monitoring and restoration efforts across the creek ecosystem. Fishers are also advocating for temporary no-fishing zones, or fish enclosures, that would allow populations to recover and reproduce within protected sections of the creek before those areas are reopened to fishing. Baya has argued that such protected areas could benefit both fishing communities and tourism operators by allowing fish to multiply and restoring the ecological abundance that makes both livelihoods viable, and other stakeholders have suggested that government support for offshore fishing access could reduce the concentration of effort in already-stressed nearshore habitats.

Ocean Pollution & Waste

The Biggest Threats to the Ocean

The Biggest Threats to the Ocean

The ocean is the planet's life-support system. It covers roughly 71% of Earth's surface, produces about half the oxygen we breathe, feeds billions of people, and acts as the world's largest climate buffer, absorbing the lion's share of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases along with a substantial share of our carbon dioxide emissions. For most of human history it seemed too vast to damage. That assumption no longer holds. Today the ocean is under pressure from a cluster of human-driven threats that reinforce one another. None acts alone: a reef weakened by warming is more vulnerable to disease and pollution; a coastline stripped of mangroves loses both its fish nursery and its storm defense. Understanding each threat, and how they interlock, is the first step toward a healthier ocean. Here is a detailed look at the eight that matter most.   1. Climate Change   The single largest driver of ocean change is the warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions. The ocean has absorbed the overwhelming majority of the extra heat humans have added to the climate system, and the consequences are now measurable and accelerating. 2024 was the hottest year on record, and ocean heat content reached its highest level in modern observational records, with the rate of warming over the past two decades running at more than twice the pace of the previous half-century. Warmer water reshapes marine life in several ways at once. It drives species toward cooler waters at the poles or into deeper layers, disrupting fisheries and food webs that took millennia to settle. It intensifies marine heatwaves, prolonged spikes in sea temperature that can kill entire ecosystems in weeks. And it fuels coral bleaching, the process in which heat-stressed corals expel the symbiotic algae that give them color and food. The most striking recent example is the fourth global coral bleaching event, which ran from early 2023 into 2025 and was confirmed by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). It was the largest and fastest on record: bleaching-level heat stress hit roughly 84% of the world's reef area across at least 83 countries and territories, spanning the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Ocean basins. Reefs can recover from bleaching if temperatures fall back, but repeated, near-annual events leave less and less time to do so, and coral reefs underpin the food and income of close to a billion people. Warming also melts polar and glacial ice, raising sea levels and threatening coastal communities, and it reduces the amount of oxygen seawater can hold, compounding other stresses described below.   2. Plastic Pollution   Plastic is the most visible form of ocean pollution and one of the most persistent. Once it enters the water it does not biodegrade. It fragments into ever-smaller pieces, microplastics under five millimeters and then nanoplastics, that spread to every corner of the ocean, from surface gyres to deep-sea sediment and polar ice. Estimates of how much plastic enters the sea each year vary widely depending on method. International bodies such as the UN Environment Programme and IUCN commonly cite a figure around 11 million tonnes annually, while some older studies put the range as high as 8 to 12.7 million tonnes. More recent high-quality modeling argues the true annual input may be lower, on the order of 1 to 2 million tonnes, with most of it accumulating near shorelines rather than drifting offshore. Whatever the precise number, the stock already in the ocean is enormous: researchers estimate somewhere between 75 and 199 million tonnes of plastic waste are currently in marine environments. The harm is well documented. Marine animals ingest plastic or become entangled in it, particularly in lost or discarded fishing gear ("ghost gear"), which is among the deadliest forms of debris. Microplastics now turn up throughout marine food chains and, increasingly, in seafood and drinking water consumed by people. Because plastic production is still rising and only a small fraction of plastic worldwide is recycled, the flow into the ocean is unlikely to slow without coordinated changes to how plastic is made, used, and managed.   3. Overfishing   For decades the ocean was treated as an inexhaustible larder. It is not. Overfishing, catching fish faster than populations can reproduce, has steadily eroded the health of global stocks. According to the FAO's most comprehensive assessment of marine fishery resources, released in 2025 and covering more than 2,500 stocks, about 35.5% of assessed stocks are now overfished, while 64.5% remain within biologically sustainable limits. That is a sharp decline from 1974, when roughly 90% of stocks were considered sustainably fished, and the share of overfished stocks has crept upward by about one percent per year in recent times. There is a more hopeful number alongside it: because well-managed, high-volume fisheries are mostly healthy, around 77% of the fish actually landed worldwide still comes from sustainable stocks. The lesson is that effective management works: regions with strong, science-based controls (such as the Northeast Pacific) post sustainability rates well above 90%, while poorly managed regions fare far worse. Beyond depleting target species, destructive fishing methods cause collateral damage. Bottom trawling drags heavy gear across the seabed, flattening habitats that can take centuries to form. Bycatch, the unintended capture of turtles, seabirds, sharks, and marine mammals, kills vast numbers of non-target animals. And the removal of key species can unravel entire food webs from the top down.   4. Ocean Acidification   Often called climate change's "evil twin," ocean acidification is a direct chemical consequence of carbon dioxide emissions. The ocean absorbs roughly 30% of the CO₂ humans release into the atmosphere. When that CO₂ dissolves in seawater it forms carbonic acid, releasing hydrogen ions that lower the water's pH. Since the start of the industrial era, average surface-ocean pH has fallen by about 0.1 units. That sounds tiny, but the pH scale is logarithmic, so the change represents roughly a 30% increase in acidity, a faster shift in ocean chemistry than anything seen in tens of millions of years. If emissions continue unchecked, the IPCC projects pH could fall enough to make the ocean around 150% more acidic by 2100. The biological stakes are high for calcifiers such as corals, oysters, clams, sea snails, and many plankton, which build shells and skeletons from calcium carbonate. More acidic water makes the carbonate building blocks harder to obtain and can even dissolve existing shells. Because some of these organisms sit at the base of the food web, the effects ripple upward to the fish and fisheries that depend on them. Acidification is also a key part of a dangerous triple squeeze on marine life, alongside warming and oxygen loss, a combination associated with mass extinctions in Earth's deep past.   5. Habitat Destruction   Some of the ocean's most valuable ecosystems sit right at the edge where land meets sea, and that is exactly where human development concentrates. Coral reefs, mangrove forests, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes are being degraded by coastal construction, dredging, land reclamation, destructive fishing, and pollution. The losses are substantial. Global mangrove cover has declined by roughly 35 to 40% over recent decades, largely cleared for aquaculture ponds, farmland, and shoreline development, though the annual rate of loss has slowed in recent years thanks to growing protection efforts. Seagrass meadows have fared similarly: studies estimate that close to 30% of mapped seagrass area has disappeared since records began, with the rate of decline accelerating to around 7% per year since 1990. Salt marshes have seen even steeper historic losses in some regions. These are not just scenic habitats. Mangroves and seagrasses are "blue carbon" powerhouses, storing carbon far more efficiently per unit area than terrestrial forests; when they are destroyed, that stored carbon is released. They also serve as nurseries for commercially important fish, filter pollutants, and shield coastlines from storm surge and erosion. Losing them weakens the ocean's biodiversity, its climate buffering, and the natural defenses that protect coastal communities.   6. Agricultural Runoff   When fertilizers and animal waste wash off farmland and flow down rivers to the sea, they carry a heavy load of nitrogen and phosphorus. These nutrients trigger explosive blooms of algae. When the algae die and decompose, bacteria consume the surrounding oxygen, leaving dead zones, areas of water so depleted of oxygen (a condition called hypoxia) that fish, crabs, and other mobile animals must flee or suffocate. The number of documented dead zones has climbed roughly tenfold over the past half-century, with scientists identifying well over 400 worldwide and some estimates running considerably higher once undocumented zones are included. The Gulf of Mexico hosts one of the largest recurring examples, fed by nutrients draining from the vast Mississippi River basin; in 2023 it spanned about 8,185 square miles, roughly the size of New Jersey. The Baltic Sea, Arabian Sea, and Chesapeake Bay are other notorious cases. Climate change is making the problem worse on two fronts: warmer water naturally holds less oxygen, and heavier rainfall flushes more nutrients off the land in concentrated pulses. The encouraging news is that dead zones respond to action: coordinated reductions in agricultural and sewage runoff have shrunk hypoxic zones in places such as the North Sea and parts of the United States.   7. Chemical and Industrial Pollution   Beyond plastic and nutrients, the ocean receives a steady stream of toxic substances: heavy metals like mercury and lead, persistent organic pollutants from industry and pesticides, untreated sewage, pharmaceutical residues, and oil from spills and routine discharges. Many of these contaminants are dangerous precisely because they persist and concentrate. Mercury, for instance, is converted by marine bacteria into methylmercury, which accumulates in tissue and biomagnifies up the food chain, meaning long-lived top predators such as tuna, swordfish, and sharks carry the highest concentrations, which is why health advisories caution against eating too much of them. Persistent organic pollutants behave similarly, lodging in the fatty tissue of marine mammals and seabirds. Oil spills cause acute, dramatic damage to coastlines and wildlife, but chronic, low-level inputs from runoff and shipping add up to far more oil entering the sea over time. Together these pollutants impair reproduction, weaken immune systems, and ultimately reach humans through the seafood we eat.   8. Deep-Sea Mining   The newest threat on this list is also the least understood. The deep seabed holds vast deposits of metals such as nickel, cobalt, copper, and manganese, bound up in potato-sized polymetallic nodules and in crusts and vents. The Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Pacific alone is estimated to contain on the order of 21 billion tonnes of nodules. As demand for battery and electronics metals grows, companies are eager to extract them. The problem is that the deep ocean is one of the least-explored environments on Earth, home to slow-growing, fragile ecosystems that may take centuries or longer to recover from disturbance, if they recover at all. Mining would stir up vast sediment plumes, destroy seafloor habitat, and introduce noise and light into a realm adapted to permanent darkness, with consequences scientists cannot yet fully predict. Governance remains unsettled. The International Seabed Authority (ISA), which oversees mining in international waters under the Law of the Sea, has spent more than a decade negotiating a "mining code" but has not adopted final commercial regulations; its July 2025 talks ended without consensus, with negotiations set to resume in 2026. Meanwhile some actors are moving to press ahead outside that framework. A prominent company has sought permits through the United States rather than the ISA, and in early 2026 U.S. authorities finalized revisions to their own domestic seabed-mining rules. At the same time, a growing coalition of states (several dozen at last count) has called for a moratorium or precautionary pause until the environmental risks are far better understood. How this tension resolves will shape whether one of the planet's last wildernesses is opened to industry.   How the Threats Compound One Another   What makes these eight threats so dangerous is that they rarely act in isolation. Warming, acidification, and oxygen loss form a "triple squeeze" that stresses marine life on multiple fronts at once. A coral reef bleached by heat is more easily smothered by sediment from coastal dredging or weakened by nutrient pollution. Overfished ecosystems lose resilience, making them slower to bounce back from a heatwave or a pollution event. Mangrove loss removes a defense that would otherwise filter runoff and buffer the very storms that climate change is intensifying. The cumulative pressure is greater than the sum of its parts.   Reasons for Hope   The picture is serious but not hopeless, and many of these threats respond well to action. Well-managed fisheries demonstrate that depleted stocks can recover. Targeted cuts to agricultural and sewage runoff have shrunk dead zones. Marine protected areas, mangrove and seagrass restoration, and international agreements, from a global treaty on plastics to negotiations over the high seas and the deep seabed, offer levers that work when they are properly enforced. Above all, because so much of the damage traces back to greenhouse gas emissions, cutting carbon is the most powerful single step for the ocean: it slows warming, eases acidification, and reduces oxygen loss simultaneously. The ocean has sustained life on this planet for billions of years and has shown a remarkable capacity to recover when pressure is relieved. The choices made over the next decade, about emissions, fishing, pollution, and the deep sea, will largely determine which version of the ocean future generations inherit. Note: Figures in this article reflect the most current authoritative assessments available as of mid-2026, drawing on sources including NOAA, the UN FAO, the IPCC, UNEP, and the International Seabed Authority. Estimates for some metrics, particularly annual plastic inputs, vary between studies, and ranges are noted where relevant.

Offshore Energy

Fugro Deploys AUV Technology for Deepwater Survey Off Timor-Leste

Fugro Deploys AUV Technology for Deepwater Survey Off Timor-Leste

Fugro has secured a contract to conduct an extensive offshore site characterisation programme off Timor-Leste, deploying autonomous underwater vehicles across water depths exceeding 3,000 metres. The survey will support planning and development of energy infrastructure associated with the Greater Sunrise and Bayu Undan projects, both central to the country's energy ambitions. Offshore operations are scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter of 2026 and run for approximately three months, delivering seabed intelligence to inform pipeline routing, engineering design and geohazard assessment.   Scope of the Survey Programme   The contract covers an extensive offshore site characterisation effort. Fugro will undertake geophysical, seismic and autonomous underwater vehicle surveys. The work spans a challenging offshore environment off Timor-Leste. The survey area includes deepwater sections with depths exceeding 3,000 metres. These conditions place significant technical demands on the survey operation. The programme is designed to generate comprehensive subsea intelligence. It will provide detailed seabed data alongside geotechnical insights. This information will support pipeline routing decisions across the development areas. It will also inform engineering design and geohazard assessment. Together these outputs underpin the safe execution of future offshore operations.   The Greater Sunrise and Bayu Undan Projects   The survey supports two projects central to Timor-Leste's energy plans. The programme relates to the Greater Sunrise and Bayu Undan developments. Both are described as strategically important to the country's future energy ambitions. The survey will cover both development areas within a single campaign. This coordinated approach allows consistent data across the region. These projects represent significant infrastructure undertakings for the nation. Developing offshore energy resources requires detailed knowledge of seabed conditions. Accurate site characterisation is a prerequisite for engineering and installation work. The survey therefore forms a foundational step in the development process. Its outputs will shape decisions taken throughout the projects' lifecycles.   Technology and Remote Support   The programme relies on advanced autonomous survey capability. Fugro will deploy autonomous underwater vehicles across the survey area. These systems are well suited to gathering high-resolution data at extreme depths. The vehicles can operate effectively where conventional methods face limitations. This makes them central to surveying beyond 3,000 metres. The technology is paired with onshore support infrastructure. Fugro will integrate the vehicles with real-time support from its Remote Operations Centres. This arrangement enhances operational efficiency during the campaign. It also improves data quality and strengthens project oversight. Combining autonomous vehicles with remote monitoring reflects a wider shift in offshore survey practice.   Read more: LNG Bunker Vessel Fleet Set to Grow 60% as Orderbook Expands   Data Processing and Delivery   Survey data will be handled through established regional facilities. Processing and quality control will take place at Fugro's data centres. These are located in Kuala Lumpur and Perth within the Asia Pacific region. This regional infrastructure supports streamlined project delivery. It reduces the delay between data collection and analysis. The approach is intended to accelerate the flow of information to clients. Processing regionally enables timely provision of high-quality insights. These insights support informed decision-making throughout project development. Faster turnaround allows engineering teams to respond to findings promptly. This connection between data gathering and practical decisions defines the programme's value.   Timeline and Execution   The project follows a defined schedule through 2026. Mobilisation and planning activities are expected to commence in the third quarter. Offshore survey operations are scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter. The offshore campaign is expected to run for approximately three months. This timeline sets a clear framework for the work ahead. The campaign encompasses several distinct survey disciplines. It will include geophysical, seismic and autonomous underwater vehicle activities. Environmental survey work also forms part of the scope. These activities will cover both development areas within the single campaign. Combining disciplines in one mobilisation improves overall efficiency.   Regional Position and Significance   The award reinforces Fugro's standing in the regional market. Company leadership said it reflects client confidence in executing complex offshore programmes. This confidence extends to work in challenging marine environments. The company combines geophysical, seismic and autonomous technologies with regional expertise. This combination is presented as central to delivering the required data. The project strengthens the company's position across Asia Pacific. It reinforces Fugro's role as a leading provider of marine site characterisation services. The work supports clients with reliable data for safer project delivery. It also contributes to more sustainable and efficient offshore development. This positions the company for further work across the region's energy sector.

Ocean Technology

NORBIT Adds Layered Media Detection to WINGHEAD X Multibeam Sonar

NORBIT Adds Layered Media Detection to WINGHEAD X Multibeam Sonar

NORBIT Subsea has released Layered Media Detection, a new optional capability for its WINGHEAD X Midwater multibeam sonar system. The feature allows surveyors to identify the fluid mud layer and the underlying navigable bottom simultaneously during a single survey. By combining detection processes across multiple frequency bands within one broadband acoustic signal, the system distinguishes sediment layers while maintaining high-resolution bathymetric performance across the full survey swath.   The Layered Media Detection Capability   The new feature addresses a specific challenge in sediment-affected waters. Layered Media Detection enables surveyors to identify the fluid mud layer during a survey. At the same time, it detects the underlying navigable bottom beneath that layer. Both measurements are captured simultaneously in a single multibeam survey pass. This removes the need for separate operations to establish each layer. The technique relies on a sophisticated acoustic approach. The system combines concurrent detection processes across multiple frequency bands. These processes operate within a single broadband acoustic signal. This allows the system to distinguish between distinct sediment layers. It achieves this while maintaining high-resolution bathymetric performance throughout.   Advantages Over Traditional Methods   The capability offers a marked improvement over established survey techniques. Traditional single-beam methods provide measurements only along individual survey lines. This produces data limited to narrow tracks across the survey area. Coverage between those lines must be inferred rather than measured. This leaves gaps in the resulting picture of the seabed. Layered Media Detection delivers substantially broader coverage. The system provides continuous bathymetric coverage across the entire survey swath. This enables surveyors to evaluate larger areas more efficiently in a single pass. The resulting continuous, high-resolution information supports more confident decision-making. Surveyors can therefore assess conditions across an area rather than along isolated lines.   Read more: Sonardyne Positioning to Track AUV Fleet Under Greenland Glaciers   The WINGHEAD X Midwater Platform   The release also introduces a new system within an established platform. It brings NORBIT's long-range midwater multibeam technology into the WINGHEAD X platform. This combines proven acoustic capability with a configurable system architecture. The integration extends the reach of the existing product family. It positions the midwater technology within a more adaptable framework. The platform is designed around customer configuration. Customers can tailor the system to their specific survey requirements. This includes selecting hardware and integrated GNSS and inertial navigation options. Software capabilities, including Layered Media Detection, can also be chosen. This modular approach allows the system to be matched to individual operational needs.   Applications and Operating Environments   The technology is suited to a range of survey settings. It supports conventional hydrographic surveying across standard applications. It is also designed for operations in ports affected by suspended sediments. Rivers and estuaries with similar conditions fall within its scope. These environments frequently present the layered sediment challenges the feature addresses. Fluid mud presents particular difficulties for navigation and port management. Distinguishing where mud ends and the navigable bottom begins affects vessel access. Accurate layer identification supports decisions on dredging and channel maintenance. Continuous coverage across a swath makes this assessment more reliable. This makes the capability directly relevant to port operations and channel management.   Significance for Survey Operations   The release reflects a broader push toward efficiency in hydrographic work. Company leadership said the feature lets surveyors explore beneath complex sediment layers. This is achieved while retaining the efficiency and coverage advantages of multibeam surveying. The combination delivers more information from each survey pass. This translates into greater productivity for survey operators. The practical benefit lies in better-informed operational decisions. More complete data supports confident assessment of conditions across an area. This is particularly valuable where sediment layers complicate the picture. NORBIT framed the outcome as empowering customers to explore more effectively. The capability therefore links technical advancement directly to operational value.

Nature & Climate

Ocean Visions Adds Marine Carbon Removal Tool to Climate Simulator

Ocean Visions Adds Marine Carbon Removal Tool to Climate Simulator

Ocean Visions has launched an Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement feature within the En-ROADS Climate Solutions Simulator, developed by Climate Interactive and MIT Sloan. The addition allows users of the science-based platform to explore how the marine carbon dioxide removal pathway could contribute to global carbon removal goals while examining its constraints, costs and uncertainties. Built in partnership with Climate Interactive, the feature brings one of the most actively researched marine removal approaches into a decision-support tool already used by more than 1.5 million people worldwide.   The New Simulator Feature   Ocean Visions has introduced a dedicated tool for a specific carbon removal pathway. The Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement feature sits within the En-ROADS Climate Solutions Simulator. That simulator was created by Climate Interactive and MIT Sloan as a science-based platform. The new feature was developed in partnership with Climate Interactive. It draws on Ocean Visions and its network of subject experts. The feature is grounded in established climate modelling. It allows users to explore how the approach could contribute to global carbon removal needs. Users can also examine the constraints, costs and uncertainties involved. This balanced framing presents both the potential and the limitations of the pathway. The result is a tool designed to support realistic assessment rather than optimistic projection.   Addressing a Knowledge Gap   The addition responds to a growing need among decision-makers. Knowledge of marine carbon dioxide removal continues to expand across the research community. This creates an increasing need to help decision-makers understand how various approaches fit together. Individual pathways must be understood within the context of overall climate strategies. The feature aims to bridge that gap between research and strategic planning. Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement represents one of the most actively researched approaches. The feature brings this pathway to a widely used decision-support tool for climate strategy. This allows users to test scenarios and compare outcomes across options. It also enables them to explore the tradeoffs between different approaches. Situating the pathway alongside alternatives supports more informed strategic choices.   Read more: Hydrogen Container Ships to Power Oslo-Rotterdam Green Shipping Corridor   Accessibility and Reach   The simulator is designed for a broad audience rather than specialists. Unlike highly specialised technical models, En-ROADS engages diverse users across sectors. It does not require modelling expertise to operate effectively. This accessibility broadens the range of people who can explore climate scenarios. It brings complex modelling within reach of non-technical decision-makers. The platform's reach is substantial across the global climate community. En-ROADS has been used by more than 1.5 million people worldwide. It is supported by a network of more than 960 Climate Ambassadors across 91 countries. This infrastructure extends the tool's influence well beyond individual users. The scale of adoption gives the new feature significant potential exposure.   Capabilities of the Tool   The feature covers multiple variants of the alkalinity enhancement approach. It represents both mineral-based and electrochemical methods within the simulator. This breadth reflects the diversity of techniques under active research. Including both allows users to compare distinct routes to the same outcome. It provides a more complete picture of the pathway's potential. The tool offers several specific analytical functions. Users can explore potential climate outcomes associated with scaling the approach. They can examine deployment constraints, costs and uncertainties in detail. The feature also allows comparison with other carbon dioxide removal approaches. Users can test policy, investment and technology assumptions and visualise results instantly through interactive scenarios.   Influence on Policy and Strategy   The simulator has demonstrated real-world influence on decision-making. Between 2022 and 2025, simulators from Climate Interactive and MIT Sloan informed 58 policies and initiatives. These spanned government, investment, corporate strategy, philanthropic and higher-education settings. This track record indicates the tools reach beyond academic exercise. It suggests the new feature could similarly shape practical climate decisions. The addition positions marine carbon removal within mainstream climate planning. By integrating the pathway into a widely used tool, it becomes part of standard scenario analysis. This helps decision-makers weigh ocean-based approaches against terrestrial alternatives. The emphasis on constraints and uncertainties encourages realistic assessment of the pathway. This approach supports more grounded discussion of the role marine carbon removal might play.

Weekly Briefing

Get essential ocean economy news delivered to your inbox every morning. Market insights, policy updates, and expert analysis.

Unsubscribe anytime.